Mayweather vs. Pacquiao

The big fight between Floyd Mayweather and Manny Pacquiao will take place at the MGM in Vegas on May 2, 2015.

We’ve decided to use Luckalyzer to predict the winner as outlined here in “How To Pick The Winner Of A Boxing Match“.

So we took Mayweather’s birthday of 2/24/1977 and Pacquiao’s birthday of 12/17/1978 and ran both through Luckalyzer to determine how well each boxer’s, brain, body, and heart will be performing. See the results below.

Mayweather Vs Pacquiao

Comparing the three life-cycles and you can see that Mayweather gets the nod and should win the fight, handing Pacquiao another defeat.

Will Luckalyzer predict Floyd Mayweather’s next win? Find out May 2nd.

Mayweather VS Canelo Prediction

The big fight between Floyd Mayweather and Canelo Alvarez will take place at the MGM in Vegas on September 14, 2013.

We’ve decided to use Luckalyzer to predict the winner as outlined here in “How To Pick The Winner Of A Boxing Match“.

So we took Mayweather’s birthday of 2/24/1977 and Canelo’s birthday of 7/18/1990 and ran both through Luckalyzer to determine how well each boxer’s, brain, body, and heart will be performing. See the results below.

Mayweather vs Canelo
Mayweather vs Canelo

If you look at each boxer’s “Physical” life-cycle. Mayweather has a DANGER and Canelo has VERY BAD. Just goes to show that boxing is not good on a person’s body.

Compare the other two life-cycles and you can see that Canelo should be hungrier (fighting with his heart) and will be making better decisions (fighting with his brain).

Using Luckalyzer, the fight doesn’t even seem close. Canelo gets the nod and should win the fight, handing Mayweather his first defeat EVER.

Will Luckalyzer predict Floyd Mayweather’s first defeat? Find out tomorrow night.

Luckalyzer Warned Of Elvis Death

One of the best uses of Luckalyzer™ is to alert you to a day, where your luck is so bad, you could possibly die that day. Let me show you how it works with a true case study involving Elvis Presley.

The birth date and the day of death can easily be found online for any dead celebrity. If we use Elvis’s you will see the following report:

In the above graph I’ve outlined the day Elvis died. As you can see the life cycle that controls Elvis’s emotions was in the red for more than a week before Elvis’s death. This indicates he was very depressed in the time before his death.

Then in the two days before his death he faced TWO days of DANGER in his Intellectual and Physical! Elvis was a total wreck with three red lights in a row.

Finally on the 16th, Elvis’s Emotional was at a dangerous peak and actually highlighted in his report as a VERY BAD day for his emotions. I think this dangerous state and all the woes in the days leading up to the 16th, was just too much for Elvis.

Reports on his death state a heart attack (but that could be a cover up). Most people believe cause of death was because of the high amounts of drugs found in his system.

My opinion is it was an overdose and it could have been prevented. Looking at the chart above again, you can see that things started to get better for Elvis starting August 24.

If he would have only taken a vacation for about 10 days, did nothing but lay on a beach and catch some rays, he would be alive with us today.

By using Luckalyzer™ and knowing what life has in store for you, you CAN avoid bad luck and have a life that is truly blessed.

Luckalyzer Predicts Egyptian Presidents Overthrow.

Ok the title is a little misleading. Luckalyzer can not predict events but can only predict peoples luck. With that said, let’s examine Mohamed Morsi’s luck.

In the chart below we’ve run his report. Notice in his Emotional column everything was green up until July 3, 2013. On July 3 his Emotional turned to “DANGER”. It was going to be one of his most unhappiest days of his life.

Sure enough, his military staged a coup and arrested him and now have him in custody.


After that we see that his Emotional remains in red (with him under arrest it is no surprise, nobody could be happy in those conditions).

Everything cumulates up until July 14 and 15 when Morsi has the “death signal“. This is not a guarantee he will die, but if he is killed by the military or some other party. These will be the most likely days.

UPDATE JULY 16 : Still no word of where Morsi is or what his health is. But one thing did happen on Saturday July 14. The new government brought criminal charges against him. So yes, July 14, things did get worse for Morsi.

How To Pick Winner Of A Boxing Match

In this post I will examine how we can use Luckalyzer to handicap and pick the winner of a boxing match, based solely on luck alone.

I went to Wikipedia and randomly chose 8 Lennox Lewis fights. In the graph below you will see the date of the fight. The outcome of the fight as well as who it was against and the opponents birthday (so you can verify these readings yourself).

I then took that info and ran the reading of how much luck each boxer would have on the night of the fight. I’ve listed Luckalyzer’s reading of each boxer as well as converting that reading into a number that can be used for comparisons (please see the chart in the upper right of the graphic). Here is how each boxer compared against the other on the night of the fight:

Lennox Lewis's fights analyzed by Luckalyzer

Now that you have data to work with, it’s time to handicap. If you use the following three rules, you would have picked all 8 winners (EVEN picking Rahmen at 20-1 to win. We cleaned up there.) :

Rule 1:
Choose the boxer that has a “G” or “VG” for the middle letter (this rates their Physical abilities). ex: on 9/24/94 above, McCall had a reading of “B G B”. The middle letter is a “G” and is thus our selection to win. NOTE: If both boxers qualify, choose the one with the higher number (found below their reading).

Rule 2:
If neither of the boxers qualified above, then look for a “G” or “VG” to be the letter on the left of the reading (this represents who will be the happiest, hence a good indicator of being the winner). ex: on 4/21/01 when the longshot Rahmen beat Lennox, Rahmen had a “G” while Lennox had a “B”. Clearly Rahmen was going to be happier that day then Lennox. And history showed that he was, after he won.

Rule 3:
If neither boxer qualifies under the above two rules, I have one more. Choose the boxer that has the most ranking points (based on the system as outlined in the graphic). If both boxers have the same points, bet on the one offering the better odds.

Summary: Following the above three rules, a bettor would have won 7 and tied on one. How well would it do on other boxers? We have not run the tests on them but you are more than welcome to run some of your own to verify the ease and simplicity of using Luckalyzer to handicap professional prize fights.

The first thing you will need is FREE Luckalyzer account. Then you can upgrade that FREE account to PREMIER ACCESS at which point you’ll be able to do readings on as many people as you want. It can be in the past or in the future. You can get all the birthdates you need off the internet and start creating your own system for beating the bookies.

Please note, just because this has worked in the past does not mean it will work in the future. Prize fights have been known to be fixed and there will always be risk.

Luckalyzer Releases Predictions For Presidential Debate 3

Winner: OBAMA

In the graph below you’ll find the Luckalyzer readings of the two candidates on October 22, 2012.

The left column represents Intellect or Brains. We see Romney coming off as the smartest with his VG (Very Good) vs Obama’s B (Bad).

The middle column is Physical or Body. Obama appears to be in better health and Romney has a dangerous D (Danger).

The right column measures Emotions or Heart. It appears Obama wins here with his G (Good) vs Romney’s B (Bad). Obama will touch the people’s hearts better.

Luckalyzer Predicts Winner Of Presidential Debate

Overall it looks like we have Romney being the slick talker (appealing to the intellect), while Obama hits at a person’s emotions. So who will be the victor?

Luckalyzer gave Obama a B-G-G and Romney a VG-D-B. Now remember, Luckalyzer ranks in the following order: VG => G => B => VB => D.

So we see that Romney has a VG and a D. Both are on the extreme ends. So lets average these out and move the “VG” down two ranks and the “D” up two ranks.

This will now give Romney a ranking of B-B-B compared to Obama’s B-G-G. If we eliminate the “B” that both have in the first column we now see a clear winner. Obama’s G-G vs Romney’s B-B.

Now if you want to go into more details we can mix the three primary cycles. Much like you can mix the three primary colors, you can mix the three cycles to make other, more complex cycles:

Mastery (two left columns) encompasses a persons ability to succeed at tasks and to obtain what they desire. We see Romney with VG-D (median of B-B) vs Obama’s B-G. Obama’s scores 1.

Passion (two right columns) encompasses a persons motivation to act, and the drive that allows a person to continue a difficult pursuit. We see Romney with D-B vs Obama’s G-G. Obama 2, Romney 0.

Wisdom (left and right columns) is the cycle that tracks the presence of mind that a person needs to make crucial decisions. We see Romney with VG-B vs Obama’s B-G. The both have a “B” so it’s really “VG” vs “G”. This one goes to Romney.

Final score on secondaries: Obama 2 and Romney 1.

UPDATE OCTOBER 22: I did a search on Google for “who won the third presidential debate” and these two came up on top. Both claimed Obama has won as predicted by Luckalyzer.

Forbes calls Obama:

Washington Post calls Obama:

How A Simple App Can Change The Outcome Of An Election

Over the last two weeks, Obama and Romney participated in the first two Presidential Debates. Obama won one and Romney won one. If only Obama or Romney had heard of Luckalyzer, they could have used it to ensure they won BOTH debates and ensured themselves a good chance at winning the Presidency.

Three months ago I used Luckalyzer to predict who would win the first and second Presidential Debates. Luckalyzer was correct on both predictions.

You can read the predictions here.

Romney won the first and Obama the second (according to CNBC, CBS News, Forbes). If Obama had used Luckalyzer, like I did, he would have known that on October 3 his brain was not working well and he would lose to Romney. Armed with this info, he should have rescheduled the debate to a day he was thinking better than Romney. In this fashion, Obama could have won both debates and really ensure a good lead over Romney.

BTW, same goes for Romney. If he knew in advance, like I did, that he would lose on October 16, he could have changed the day to debate to a better one.

So once again, we see more good people failing because they refused to follow the advice of Luckalyzer.

We make it so simple for you. Luckalyzer has a built-in feature that will monitor your highs and lows and warn you, in advance, of upcoming success or failure. This feature is available only to PREMIER MEMBERS.

Don’t make the same mistake President Obama or Governer Romney did. It’s not worth it. It’s only a $10 fee for a whole year of protection. Login to your account and upgrade now.

Luckalyzer Predicts Winner Of Second Debate

On October 16th we’ll get to see the second Presidential Debate between President Obama and challenger Mitt Romney.

Click here to read Luckalyzer’s prediction for the first presidential debate.

In the second debate, it seems we have the opposite of the first debate. President Obama will have the passion (G/B vs VB/B) and Romney will present the better arguments (G/B vs Obama’s B/B). You can view the readings in the chart below:

Luckalyzer Predicts Winner Of Presidential Debate

In the graph above there are three life cycles represented by the three columns in the row. Each column has a ranking from “VG” (Very Good) to “D” (Danger). Actual ranks are: VG – G – B – VB – D.

Overall, Obama has a B-G-B and Romney has G-VB-B. If we compare the two we can use process of elimination to see who has the edge. Both candidates have a “G”, both have a “B”. That leaves the final set.

Obama has a “B” left and Romney has a “VB”. Since B is better than VB we’ll give the nod to President Obama coming out ahead in the 2nd debate (since it is so close, there may be no clear winner).

UPDATE OCT 16 2012: The results are in and once again Luckalyzer picks the winner three months in advance. Here are the reports from various news agencies:

CNBC Viewer Poll gives it to Obama:
Forbes gives it to Obama:
CBS News gives it to Obama:

Luckalyzer Predicts Winner Presidential Debate 2012

The Presidential Debates start on October 3rd and the whole world is waiting to see who will come out on top. Fortunately at Luckalyzer, we don’t have to wait.

We used Luckalyzer to analyze the life cycles of the two candidates, President Obama and Mitt Romney. What we wanted to know is who will speak the best on October 3rd? Which candidate is using his brain on all cyclinders?

Unfortunately, people don’t always vote for who is the slickest talker. Sometimes voters are looking for the candidate that is looking out for them. Sometimes voters look past words and look more to the action. Which candidate is more passionate about looking out for the little guy and doing the right thing.

In the graph below we ran both candidates life cycles. There are three life cycles represented by the three columns. They range from “VG” (Very Good) to “D” (Danger). Actual ranks are: VG – G – B – VB – D.

The column on the left measures how well that candidates brain will be functioning. As we see below, President Obama’s brain will be making the right moves as it has a “G” compared to Romney’s “B”.

It’s also one thing to be smart, but another to be WISE. Wisdom comes from the column on the left AND the column on the right combined. You have Obama with a G/G vs Romney’s B/VG (which averages out to G/G). It’s close but Obama gets the slight nod.

Luckalyzer Predicts Winner Of Presidential Debate

But who has the passion? Passion is measured with the center column and the right column combined. Obama has a “D” (Danger) and a “G” (Good). Romney on the other hand has a “G” and a “VG” (Very Good). That combination of G/VG is more powerful than D/G. They both have a “G”, but Romney comes out ahead with the “VG” compared to Obama’s “D”.

Since Romney wins the passion clearly, and it’s close on Wisdom, Romney gets the pick to win the first Presidential Debate.

BTW, notice how Romney has the highest ranking possible in the far right column with a “VG”? This column represents that persons emotions. On October 3rd, Romney will be much happier than President Obama. Could this mean he feels he did the best?

UPDATE: October 4th 2012, the jury is in and Romney came out the clear leader according to polls by CBS News of the most important voters, the uncommitted.

Click here to read Luckalyzer’s prediction for the second presidential debate On October 16, 2012.

Mark Zuckerberg Uses Luckalyzer?

Unless you are living in a cave you’ve probably read the news that on May 18, 2012 Mark Zuckerberg took Facebook public. It was the biggest IPO in history.

What you may not know, is that the next day, Mark married Priscilla Chan.

If we take a look at Mark’s Luckalyzer reading (below) we find that Mark’s luck was running bad until May 18, 2012 when his WISDOM cycle (combination of Intellectual and Emotional) became extremely lucky. It was on that day he successfully pulled off the largest IPO in history.

Mark only had a three day window where his WISDOM was running extremely lucky (all green). So not only did he do the IPO on the 18th, he got married on the 19th to insure a long and happy marriage.

Mark Zuckerberg's good luck predicted by Luckalyzer.

In hindsight, either Mark Zuckerberg’s good fortune and happy marriage was predicted by Luckalyzer, or Mark Zuckerberg used Luckalyzer to plan his IPO and marriage to occur on lucky days.

UPDATE: On May 21, 2012, Marks luck went to bad, especially Emotional. On that day, the value of Marks company, Facebook, dropped 10% ($10 billion wiped out). The next day, the 22nd, another $8 billion of value out the window. You can see from the chart above that his Emotional had gone bad. Something bad was going to happen. Now we know what it is.